Scientists show that media coverage for the sports of women has been less in relation to the coverage for the sports of men. Millions of young women from around the planet play sports daily. But, the quantity of girls playing sports doesn’t correspond to the quantity of media coverage they get. In 1989, a study was conducted that recorded and compared the quantity of media coverage of women’s and guys sports on sports comment shows that were popular.
Michael Messner and his team examined 3 distinct two-week intervals by recording the quantity of time that the reports were on the content of the stories as well as atmosphere. They composed a quantitative description of what it is that they saw and a qualitative of the period of time that report received after recording sports news and highlights.
During that first year the research was conducted in 1989, it was recorded that 5% of the sports sections were based on women’s sports, when compared with the 92% that were based on men’s sports and the 3% that was a mixture of both. In 1999, women’s sports coverage reached an all time high when it was recorded at 8.7%. It kept it is higher percents until it reached an all time low in 2009, falling down to 1.6%.
The researchers also quantified the quantity of time that the sports of women were reported in the News ticker, the strip that shows information in the underside of the majority of news programs. When recorded in 2009 of Ticker coverage was based on the sports of women, when compared with the. These percentages were recorded to be able to compare the quantity of media coverage for every sex.